Thank you, Maxim, for your reply. > It's not really a big deal though, as > ssl_session_cache with builtin cache was available all the time, > and there is no serious difference as it's not possible to use > multiple worker processes on Windows. Based on that statement I will not bother with that setting for now.
Thanks again, Igal On 5/16/2015 8:31 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Hello! > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:30:11PM -0700, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > >> hi, >> >> I know that in the past the directive: >> >> ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:1m; >> >> did not work on Windows. >> >> in nginx 1.9.0 I see "*) Feature: shared memory can now be used on >> Windows versions with address space layout randomization." >> >> does that mean that ssl_session_cache can be used on Windows now? if >> so, is 1m a good value? > Yes, now ssl_session_cache with shared cache can be used on all > versions of Windows. It's not really a big deal though, as > ssl_session_cache with builtin cache was available all the time, > and there is no serious difference as it's not possible to use > multiple worker processes on Windows. > > The 1m is expected to store about 4000 sessions, see > http://nginx.org/r/ssl_session_cache. This is enough assuming > less sessions are created during ssl_session_timeout (5m by > default). > _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
