Hi.
Am 13-10-2015 22:11, schrieb steve:
On 10/14/2015 09:03 AM, nanaya wrote:
[snipp]
You said
As can be seen from the google article, it's apparently a bad
thing(tm)
to duplicate content for example.com/ and example.com. Apparently
some
but the google article clearly says otherwise (unless you're referring
to a different google article).
I suggest you re-read the article... whilst it does include the Chuck
Norris quote, it also states 'While it’s not totally optimal behavior,
it’s perfectly legitimate and a-okay. :)'.
To be honest wasn't the answers below not helpful?!
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2015-October/048923.html
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2015-October/048927.html
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2015-October/048937.html
What's wrong with it?
I'm interested in a solution, thanks for sharing.
BR
Aleks
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
