A bad workman always blames his tools ! On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Amanat <[email protected]> wrote: > i was using Apache from last 3 years. never faced a single problem. Few days > ago i think to try Nginx. As i heard from mny people. Its very fast memory > efficient webserver. Trust me guys. Nginx can never be memory efficient. > Rather it consumes memory same like my mozilla. I never understand for what > reason it creates a garbage of disk cache for every request. > look at the pic > > http://i.imgur.com/pD7rEDe.png > > Though i like some features of Nginx like header modification and error > 444. > > Apart from that Nginx is worst. > > My Server configuration: > Architecture: x86_64 > CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit > Byte Order: Little Endian > CPU(s): 8 > On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 > Thread(s) per core: 2 > Core(s) per socket: 4 > Socket(s): 1 > NUMA node(s): 1 > Vendor ID: GenuineIntel > CPU family: 6 > Model: 58 > Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz > Stepping: 9 > CPU MHz: 1601.453 > CPU max MHz: 3800.0000 > CPU min MHz: 1600.0000 > BogoMIPS: 6784.50 > Virtualization: VT-x > L1d cache: 32K > L1i cache: 32K > L2 cache: 256K > L3 cache: 8192K > NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7 > > > I can use 2 Gb ram whole day with apache and with Nginx even 32 gb ram works > only for 5 min. > > If any of you have any suggestion to tweak nginx config. Please tell me. > > Posted at Nginx Forum: > https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,269159,269159#msg-269159 > > _______________________________________________ > nginx mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
-- Anoop P Alias _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
