3) Yes, if you want use it trough Loquacious strongly-typed configuration We talk about Attributes long time ago and the end was:We need a class where hold a specific-Validator-parameters, why not use directly the attribute ? The conclusion was: use Attribute.
2009/2/11 Dario Quintana <[email protected]> > Maybe I wasn't clear enough. > > What I mean with metadata is that right now, to define a custom Validator > we need: > 1) Create the validator (inherits from IValidator) > 2) Create the Attribute with parameters > > Now with this fluent cfg, for custom "Fluent-Validators", we need to add 1) > and 2) plus: > 3) Extension methods with pointing to custom rules. > > That way ? > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2009/2/11 Dario Quintana <[email protected]> >> >>> I know, that means: attributes is the metatada ? For me it's and is >>> enough. >> >> >> IClassMapping has metadata and we have 4 implementation of it. >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> >> > > > -- > Dario Quintana > http://darioquintana.com.ar > > > > -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com.ar/group/nhcdevs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
