I think we should put it as a goal because it is natural to have it. It's only an issue of how we ported that feature. Today we did a lot more of work than the original (we have a lot of features that there are not there) but we are missing this.
In any case i think that most people will use the ValidatorEngine because it is handy... Gustavo. On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > This mean that it should be a target of the coming soon release ? > > 2009/2/16 Gustavo Ringel <[email protected]> > > I think it is needed, in Java if i recall right it is possible because of >> the way generics works there... >> >> Gustavo. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> Based on what I saw on the NET who are using NHV are working with the >>> ValidatorEngine instead create an instance on ClassValidator (the very old >>> way). >>> >>> What about IClassValidator<TEntity> ? >>> >>> It need a big refactoring+breaking change. >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio Maulo >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com.ar/group/nhcdevs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
