I've seen it yesterday.
Thanks a lot.
On 22 oct, 20:24, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> I fixed it in a slight different way
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:18 AM, mathieu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, here it is (didn't know I could put files here...) :
>
> >http://nhcdevs.googlegroups.com/web/searchfactory.patch?gsc=Q25PpBYAA...
>
> > On 19 oct, 00:06, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Please ATTACH the patch here.
>
> > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:04 AM, mathieu <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > I was also wondering why there isn't access to the ISessionFactory
> > > > from IFullTextSession (as in Hibernate.Search), so I've added it, too.
>
> > > > Here is the patch (as I can't manage to add attachments...) :
>
> > > > -- BEGIN PATCH
> > > > Index: NHibernate.Search/IFullTextSession.cs
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- NHibernate.Search/IFullTextSession.cs (revision 1058)
> > > > +++ NHibernate.Search/IFullTextSession.cs (working copy)
> > > > @@ -37,5 +37,10 @@
> > > > /// </summary>
> > > > /// <param name="clazz"></param>
> > > > void PurgeAll(System.Type clazz);
> > > > +
> > > > + /// <summary>
> > > > + /// Gets the SearchFactory associated with this session
> > > > + /// </summary>
> > > > + ISearchFactory SearchFactory { get; }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > \ No newline at end of file
> > > > Index: NHibernate.Search/Impl/FullTextSessionImpl.cs
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- NHibernate.Search/Impl/FullTextSessionImpl.cs (revision 1058)
> > > > +++ NHibernate.Search/Impl/FullTextSessionImpl.cs (working copy)
> > > > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
> > > > this.sessionImplementor = (ISessionImplementor) session;
> > > > }
>
> > > > - private ISearchFactory SearchFactory
> > > > + public ISearchFactory SearchFactory
> > > > {
> > > > get
> > > > {
> > > > Index: NHibernate.Search/Impl/SearchFactoryImpl.cs
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- NHibernate.Search/Impl/SearchFactoryImpl.cs (revision 1058)
> > > > +++ NHibernate.Search/Impl/SearchFactoryImpl.cs (working copy)
> > > > @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
>
> > > > List<LuceneWork> queue = new List<LuceneWork>();
> > > > queue.Add(new OptimizeLuceneWork(entityType));
> > > > - WaitCallback cb =
> > > > BackendQueueProcessorFactory.GetProcessor(queue);
> > > > + BackendQueueProcessorFactory.GetProcessor(queue)(null);
> > > > }
>
> > > > public Dictionary<IDirectoryProvider, object>
> > > > GetLockableDirectoryProviders()
>
> > > > -- END PATCH
>
> > > > On 18 oct, 15:30, mathieu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Hello everyone,
>
> > > > > I posted this one on nhusers, but as it is a "patch", I think it
> > > > > belongs here. If it isn't the case, feel free to "moderate" this
> > > > > message.
>
> > > > > Index optimization is not working when I call
> > > > > "SearchFactoryImpl.GetSearchFactory
> > > > > (cfg).Optimize(typeof(MyEntity));"
>
> > > > > In SearchFactoryImpl.cs (rev 1051)
> > > > > Line 310 : WaitCallback cb =
> > BackendQueueProcessorFactory.GetProcessor
> > > > > (queue);
> > > > > Nothing is done with the WaitCallBack.
> > > > > Should'nt the line be :
> > > > > BackendQueueProcessorFactory.GetProcessor(queue)(null) ?
>
> > > > > According to SearchFactoryImpl.java (hibernate.search 3.1.1) :
> > > > > Line 353 : getBackendQueueProcessorFactory().getProcessor( queue
> > ).run
> > > > > ();
>
> > > > > Thank you
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.ar/group/nhcdevs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
