I'm also concerned about NHibernate.Search in particular, and am able to
help with any volunteer effort needed. We've been needing to keep a local
build of NHSearch (which works ok) but Lucene.Net is showing good signs of
ongoing progress, and I want to incorporate those updates as well. Doing
all this would would be better on a shared repo.

-r

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Valeriu Caraulean <[email protected]>wrote:

> Getting back to this question as today I'm digging into NHibernate.Search
> and it looks like things are getting worse:
>  - The code on sourceforge repository isn't compatible with NHibernate 3.2
>  - There is a cloned NH.Search repository in github but it's not up to
> date with SVN (https://github.com/martinernst/NHibernate.Search)
>  - One of the forks of that repository contains changes to make it work
> with NH 3.2 and latest Lucene.
>
> That's very sad to see...
>
> What is blocking actually the Contrib project to be moved to GitHub under
> the NHibernate organization? Common decision of all contributors or just a
> volunteer is needed to do the work?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhcdevs/-/bLJS3KFv7sIJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhcdevs?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NHibernate Contrib - Development Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhcdevs?hl=en.

Reply via email to