On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probably; both are fruit. > Who are using IoC, probably, are using AOP of the same FW; who are using AOP > are using DynProxy. > Now, who want can use the same DynProxy in NH (for example to inject the > ProxyFactory) > Some weeks ago Oren begin a branch to use NH with PostSharp; a complete > separation from the DynProxy is needed. > BTW to have more than one choice is a good thing; for that i'm using IoC. > Thanks to leave here your opinion.
Not sure I follow. I might be using Spring or Windsor, they wont interfere on how NH handles proxies. AOP will be limited to my services, not domain classes. The choice of what I'd like NH to use to create proxies (be it DP, PostSharp or whatever) is orthogonal to my choice of framework stack. Anyway, I was just curious on the rationale - which seems broken. No strong opinions. -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/
