We will take the decision when will be the moment to take it. Don't worry.
2009/1/10 Davy Brion <[email protected]>

> this is great news... suppose we have a complete implementation at the end
> of those 3 months, do we release NH 2.1 with the linq support? or do we keep
> it out of the core until NH 3.0?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry... there is a prerequisite...The work must be followed by, at
>> least, a NH team committers.
>> We must check quality and that the project are following the target of
>> LINQ2NH of the trunk.
>> To be clear...
>> To work with LINQ, or have a similar and very closer result, so far we
>> have 2 existing project:
>> - NHibernate.LINQ on Contrib
>> - NH-lamda-criteria in google code
>>
>> I would like to be sure that the new project can be added to the trunk;
>> perhaps Chad or Oren can follow the development of the new project. To you
>> the final decision.
>>
>> 2009/1/9 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
>>
>> 2009/1/9 Chad Lee <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me.  How would this fit in with Fabio's Artorius?  Isn't
>>>> that a prerequisite to getting Linq to NH working in the trunk?
>>>
>>>
>>> There is not a prerequisite.
>>> Sure, when Artorius have its QueryTranslator working the work of a
>>> possible LINQ2NH would be only a ExpressionTree converter and believe me
>>> that is more easy than translate the ExpressionTree to SQL.
>>> More than that LINQ2NH need "some" extensions to support al HQL feature
>>> as, for example, "join fetch", "with" clause, "elements", "embedded
>>> properties" as "count", "id".... without talk about "registrable" HQL
>>> function for each dialiact.
>>>
>>> Who want can start, or better "re-start", the work on LINQ2NH and we will
>>> happy with the result.
>>>
>>> When Artorius is ready to be "injected" in the trunk we can think about
>>> what we want/must do.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>
>>> P.S. even if I'm working it I'm not considerer Artorius as MY product; it
>>> is a NH team product.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davy Brion
> http://davybrion.com
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to