NH now works just fine with DTC.I did not port TransactionContext, the main reason is that in .Net there really isn't the need for that. There are only two transaction types, local and DTC.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > @Ayende > > I remember you working on Transaction stuff but i don't know the scope, is > that the following? > > - TransactionStrategy (TransactionFactoryFactory, > TransactionContext, AdoNetContext....)So far talk about NH-Transaction and > talk of Ado.NET transaction, is in practice, the same. > We have a configurable transaction.factory_class but without alternatives. > The target of this work is recreate the same infrastructure of involved > classes H3.2.6 have and allow NH to create and work > with ambient-transactions. > > Thanks > > > Tuna Toksöz > http://tunatoksoz.com > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi friend.The time of my "no electricity" vacation is very closer. >> >> Even if we still have something on the Slate >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/nhibernate-development/browse_thread/thread/65a9da3e1f2fc63e >> perhaps is the time to take a decision about the next release. >> >> I would like to release NH2.1.0.Alpha1 in May/2009, and then start a >> 15-days sprints for each release (Alpha2, Beta1, Beta2, RC1, GA). >> After Beta2 we can create the 2.1.X branch. >> After the creation of the branch we can move NH-Core to NET3.5 and include >> in the trunk all useful stuff available, so far, in various different prjs. >> At that point, IMO, the name of the trunk should be NH-3.0.0 and I hope to >> include the result of Artorius. >> >> Thoughts ? >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> > >
