anybody? Tuna Toksöz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike
Typos included to enhance the readers attention! On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > Or have a Real reference Object? > > Tuna Toksöz > http://tunatoksoz.com > http://twitter.com/tehlike > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello again, >> >> I took a look at sessionfactory & serialization and found an interesting >> thing. >> >> SessionFactory is serializable but only it's name and uuid is >> serialized(maybe some other minor stuff). >> >> SessionFactory implements IObjectReference(which I didn't know >> previously). After serialization takes place, the method "GetRealObject" is >> called to get the real object. >> >> NH executes the following in that method: >> >> public object GetRealObject(StreamingContext context) >> { >> ISessionFactory result = >> SessionFactoryObjectFactory.GetInstance(uuid); >> if (result == null) >> { >> result = >> SessionFactoryObjectFactory.GetNamedInstance(name); >> if (result == null) >> throw new NullReferenceException("Could not find a >> SessionFactory named " + name + " or identified by uuid " + uuid); >> } >> return result; >> } >> >> if sesisonFactory is deserialized into a different app domain, then it >> checks if that appdomain has the factory with *name*, if deserialized >> into same appdomain, then it is taken from the objectSessionFactory. >> >> >> >> In our case, this approach won't work. >> >> What do you think I should do? Just make session factory fully >> serializable? Then what's the purpose of SessionFactoryObjectFactory? A >> custom serializer? >> >> Tuna Toksöz >> http://tunatoksoz.com >> http://twitter.com/tehlike >> >> Typos included to enhance the readers attention! >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> What is needed is the SessionFactory serialization.The Conf should have >>> a method to upLoad a serialized sessionFactory and you can use this method >>> instead call BuildSessionFactory. >>> >>> 2009/2/5 Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> >>> >>>> So it comes back to "serializing Configuration" idea? as in ram >>>> operations are way cheaper than xml validation. >>>> >>>> >>>> Tuna Toksöz >>>> http://tunatoksoz.com >>>> http://twitter.com/tehlike >>>> >>>> Typos included to enhance the readers attention! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> The BuildSessionFactory is the "in-ram compilation" of all mappings >>>>> and persistence stuff. >>>>> Serializing the sessionFactory and saving it to your hard-drive is >>>>> equivalent to create an "EXE" of the persistence stuff. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio Maulo >>> >> >> >
