In any case from time to time people come here trying to do performance tests how it is NH comparedt to [put_your_fancy_ORM].
There is no way to establish this, and if you are learning one of them or worst if you are learning both, you're going to find that you didn't think (in NH side) about 1st and 2nd level cache, query cache, StateLessSession, and a million of things that improve performance even if one get or query is a little slower first time because of any reason... There are at list thousands of NH Users, there will be millions of EF Users (at least as long as MS will be the Mainstream)...so, first of all decide the technology, and then when you decide, ask the communities how to improve your real problem, that will save a lot of efforts you put now on solving a problem which doesn't exist. My experience is that NH Users community is very professional, i don't have experience with the EF community...I'm not very enthusiastic about having the experience meantime at least. Gustavo. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Chucara <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ayende: I only have a single class mapped using nHibernate. Nevermind > though, I was just curious. 120/30 seconds is more than enough > performance in most cases. > > Thanks a lot for your help, you just saved me several hours!
