It is a way for SVN to keep track on the actual merge info.I think that this is horribly broken, because we don't know what are real changes and what are SVN changes.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know but it happened formerly, too. I guess it is some sort of SVN > stuff. > > > > Tuna Toksöz > http://tunatoksoz.com > http://turkiyealt.net > http://twitter.com/tehlike > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tuna, do you know why the revert of r4104 are including a lot of others >> files ? (see the svn log) >> >> 2009/3/2 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi. >>> Tuna, please revert revision 4104 >>> >>> If you have a IList<Product> instead IList<ProductA> the code don't work >>> properly and it is an introduction of a bug. >>> About this matter we have some documentation: >>> http://www.hibernate.org/407.html >>> "One-to-many association to a subclass requires explicit where attribute" >>> >>> We have also NH-1674 linked to the same issue >>> >>> With your change we can't have a collection based on the base class using >>> a generic list. >>> >>> After revert we can add a more deeper test using generic collections. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Fabio Maulo >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> > >
