Davy, don't get me wrong, I'm not against if it's an improvement, I just want a vote a least, an email to the dev-list, is what I'm asking to you in the second comment, 3 days ago. I just reverted till at least a discussion was taken, I reverted it, I sent a email, and now we are talking.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Davy Brion <[email protected]> wrote: > but what if the change is an _improvement_ ? > > if you feel it should've been discussed on the list first, then fine, > you're right > > by the same token, reverting the change would've warranted discussion as > well > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Dario Quintana < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> It's a breaking change becuase by default NH is generating a different >> code that the users were use to it, and change the behavior of the system. >> The change could be small, but still being a breaking change. >> >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Davy Brion <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> how exactly is that a breaking change? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dario Quintana >> http://darioquintana.com.ar >> > > -- Dario Quintana http://darioquintana.com.ar
