So far, that project, is for NO-RDBMS dialect and really I'm thinking about discard it.In theory all dialect are "contrib" (all but one at least)
2009/4/6 Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> > How about contrib dialects? Bad idea? > > Tuna Toksöz > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz > http://tunatoksoz.com > http://twitter.com/tehlike > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, you can.Dialects and Drivers are "injectables" trough >> session-factory configuration. >> >> >> 2009/4/6 Dario <[email protected]> >> >>> >>> Fabio, >>> >>> we can't do that. >>> >>> The only alternative would be to tell our customers to download the >>> current "standard" Nhibernate, supply them our classes and ask them to >>> recompile everything. >>> >>> This of course will be less than optimal since there will not be a >>> "precompiled" (binary) version available. >>> >>> Dario >>> >>> On 6 Apr, 16:38, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > 2009/4/6 Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > Curious what the alternate would be --? Add the dialect to something >>> > > slightly off-center like Nhcontrib (not a recommendation, just a >>> thought). >>> > >>> > > We dont sort of have a place for less-than-mainstream-db-dialects sep >>> from >>> > > the trunk (at present), right? >>> > >>> > The alternative could be c-treeACE distribute the dialect in some >>> > open-source space. >>> > >>> > BTW my vote is : +1 >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Fabio Maulo >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> > > -- Fabio Maulo
