In the other mail ?yes, but you can study it more deeper during development and if you find something else... well... you sure know.
2009/4/7 Davy Brion <[email protected]> > sure > > do you think the approach i outlined in the other thread would be > sufficient? > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Davy, do you want work on it ? >> >> 2009/4/7 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> >> >> 2009/4/7 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Future is a strong optimization that we make based on features of the >>>> RDBMS. >>>> I think that it make sense to make it portable, but I worry about how >>>> you do it. >>>> >>> >>> I worry about multi-RDBMS support and about all other IQuery/ICriteria >>> feature support as UniqueResult, ResultTrasformer and so on. >>> >>> -- >>> Fabio Maulo >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> > > -- Fabio Maulo
