Awesome, thanks Stephen! And congrats for the MVP award once more!!

Tuna Toksöz
Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.

http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://twitter.com/tehlike




On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have this basically completed using DocProject back-ended with SandCastle
> under the hood.
>
> The remaining tasks are:
>
>    - convert the vs-integrated help file compilation to a command-line
>    invocation that's build-script-invokable
>    - customize the graphics, color, etc. of the output HTML for the
>    web-based version of the API reference
>    - puzzle out the best way to include/deploy the dependencies (probably
>    in \TOOLS\) needed for successful invocation of SandCastle-based projects
>    - commit the above work to the 2.1 branch
>
> I would anticipate being able to complete this over the coming weekend
> without any troubles.
>
> Steve Bohlen
> [email protected]
> http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
> http://twitter.com/sbohlen
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> and i know that ndoc2 is not for api documentation :)
>>
>> Tuna Toksöz
>> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
>>
>> http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
>> http://tunatoksoz.com
>> http://twitter.com/tehlike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> What is the progress on this? I can try integrating sandcastle command
>>> line thing into the trunk as ndoc2 is throwing on me at the moment.
>>>
>>> Tuna Toksöz
>>> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
>>>
>>> http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
>>> http://tunatoksoz.com
>>> http://twitter.com/tehlike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since I wasnt working w the NH source but rather the binaries, I was
>>>> testing purely in VS and not considering that (of course) the build scripts
>>>> = the way NH gets compiled ra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to