Sorry?I attached the test to my original email

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oren... please upload the test... try to avoid to be Rhino ;)
>
> 2009/9/10 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
>
> Oren can you commit the test before the fix ?Perhaps we should see some
>> effect and we can find a reasonable solution without disable a feature.
>> The QueryPlanCache is very important especially for those of us are using
>> HQL in mapping instead Criteria.
>>
>> 2009/9/10 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
>>
>> I am not sure about the effect of (a), I will have to check.
>>> I am currently trying to fix the problem using (d), but providing a place
>>> in the session to store those things.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Richard Brown (gmail) <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Option a/ sounds easiest - but how much time does the cache save?
>>>> (Enough to make it worthwhile working on?  I'm guessing 'yes'.  [image:
>>>> Sad smile emoticon] )
>>>>
>>>> Option b/ sounds like it would lose all the benefits of the cache unless
>>>> it's used in a tight loop somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> Option c/ sounds workable - is the query/tree easy to clone? (I'm
>>>> guessing it's not trivial)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there an option d/ for making the ParameterTranslationImpl threadsafe?
>>>> (If I/we could get rid of the call to
>>>> AdjustNamedParameterLocationsForQueryParameters() would it be threadsafe
>>>> again?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  *From:* Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 10, 2009 7:27 PM
>>>> *To:* nhibernate-development <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject:* [nhibernate-development] Re: Thread Safety issue with NH
>>>> 2.1.x
>>>>
>>>> Okay, correction, I am not sure how to fix this issue. 
>>>> ParameterTranslationImpl
>>>> must be stateful for the lifetime of the query.
>>>> The problem is that we must never give the same query to two threads at
>>>> the same time.
>>>> This basically kills our query plan cache purpose.
>>>>
>>>> As I see it, we have three options:
>>>> a/ disable the query cache completely
>>>> b/ make the query cache a per thread query
>>>> c/ clone the query from the cache when we give it out
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am following on a bug report that I got, and I have confirmed that we
>>>>> have a thread safety issue within NHibernate. The conditions for that
>>>>> are quite esoteric, which is why no one got it so far. I attached a patch
>>>>> the expose the issue.
>>>>> This was introduced in r4679, to fix NH-1908.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is that in ParameterTranslationImpl, we get the wrong
>>>>> value. There is a note there that says:
>>>>>
>>>>>  // Steve Strong Note:  The original Java does not do this decrement;
>>>>> it increments i for
>>>>> // every parameter type.  However, within the
>>>>> Loader.GetParameterTypes() method, this introduces
>>>>> // nulls into the paramTypeList array, which in turn causes
>>>>> Loader.ConvertITypesToSqlTypes() to crash
>>>>> // with a null dereference.  An alternative fix is to change the Loader
>>>>> to handle the null.  I'm
>>>>> // not sure which fix is the most appropriate.
>>>>> // Legacy.FumTest.CompositeIDQuery() shows the bug if you remove the
>>>>> decrement below...
>>>>>
>>>>> That is indeed the error that I am getting most of the time, but that
>>>>> isn't what is bother me.
>>>>> What is bother me is that we have a test that fails only under multi
>>>>> threaded conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tracked it down and it looks like the issue is with the query plan
>>>>> cache. It will serve the same instance of a query plan for several threads
>>>>> at the same time.
>>>>> That is fine on its own, the problem is that there are things there,
>>>>> like ParameterTranslationImpl, which are stateful, and get corrupted when
>>>>> used from multiple threads.
>>>>> I will commit a fix for this particular issue shortly, but it is
>>>>> something that we have to consider as well, because I don't think that we
>>>>> want to take the burden of ensuring that everything works right all the 
>>>>> time
>>>>> under multi threading scenarios.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>

<<Emoticon10.gif>>

Reply via email to