There was a matter about Cast and the old-parser... I don't remember it
exactly but for sure there is a specific test so, if your fix now is passing
all test well... it is fine and does not need revision ;)


2009/11/5 Steve Strong <[email protected]>

>
> Hi All,
>
> I've just made a change to this type.  It used to have a member field that
> stored the return type of the Cast, but since the instance is shared this
> was causing problems.  For example, in the following HQL:
>
> select cast(count(o), int) from Order o where o.OrderDate <= cast(:p1,
> datetime)
>
> the processing second cast operator incorrectly causes the type of the
> select to change from an int to a datetime. I don't believe this to be the
> fault of the parser, rather a fault in the original implementation of
> CastFunction.
>
> I'm pretty sure the changes I've made are fine, and all the tests are
> passing, but I'd appreciate someone taking a look in case I've missed the
> point of what the original code was doing.  The only change is within
> CastFunction.cs, and you can see a call to the ReturnType() method (the one
> that was at fault) from Hql/Ast/Antlr/Tree/MethodNode.DialectFunction().  My
> changes are in revision 4819.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to