and those object are mutable or not ? (I mean the "right" side of the one-to-one)
2009/11/17 Eduardo Scoz <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature, so I thought it would be worthy > to post here. > > It seems that during a save operation on a tree that contains immutable > objects, even though those objects are not updated (correct behavior), > objects that have a one-to-one relationship to those ones get updated. > > For example: > > I have a object UserData, with a many-to-one to User with a one-to-one > UserPreferences. > User in this case is immutable and kept in read-only cache. > When I do a save on the UserData object, that object gets saved, and so > does UserPreferences. > > Is that the correct behavior? I would expect only UserData to be saved. > Sets that are part of User are not updated. > > Thanks guys, > > Eduardo Scoz > > > -- Fabio Maulo
