No problem. btw have a look to this NUnit 2.5 feature http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=setupFixture&r=2.5.3
<http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=setupFixture&r=2.5.3>In my integration tests I have some read-only tests to test queries and performance (using our Statistics because I don't like "tests by eyes" so much). I'm using the SetUpFixtureAttribute to set the WellKnownDb state before run all tests in the ReadOnly and Performance integration-test-suite (the db is populated before run-tests and destroyed after tests). P.S. I'll upgrade NUnit and Castle-DynProxy soon. 2009/12/16 Steve Strong <[email protected]> > Any objections to us using NDbUnit for database population in some of the > NH tests? In the Linq tests, I've got a fairly large dataset which, to keep > it independent from the database, I'm inserting it by creating instances and > adding them to the session. I'm guessing the NDbUnit will achieve the same > goal (database independence) but may well run quicker. Thoughts= > > Cheers, > > Steve -- Fabio Maulo
