Oh sorry, I misread my own statement (and can't rely on my memory).
Ayende was talking about collections of collections. Well, anyway, if you need 
it, it's in re-linq. If that's already in NH, all the better.

Cheers,
Stefan

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Diego Mijelshon
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 2:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] NH3.0 Alpha1

Um... eager fetching of collections is already implemented.

   Diego

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 08:52, Wenig, Stefan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Steve,

I'm not sure I've pointed you there personally, so if you haven't yet, pls take 
a look here:
http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2010/02/05/if-you-are-way-off-in-the-deep-end-there.aspx#37876

Short version: I think you can easily have eager fetching of collections, which 
you don't have right now if I'm not completely mistaken.

Cheers,
Stefan


From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Steve Strong
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 1:19 PM

To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] NH3.0 Alpha1

As far as I'm aware, eager loading is all done.  Let me know if there are any 
useful scenarios that the current code can't handle.  I do need to do a blog 
post on it, since it's possibly not obvious that it's there.

Cheers,

Steve
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

I'm not 100% sure if it's all finished, but there appears to be (working) tests 
for it:

http://nhibernate.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nhibernate/trunk/nhibernate/src/NHibernate.Test/Linq/EagerLoadTests.cs?revision=4948&view=markup

From: Hoang Tang<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 6:01 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] NH3.0 Alpha1

Steve,

I've seen on your blog that eager loading is planned for the new Linq provider, 
how close are you on that? What is the planned api?

Thanks,

Hoang
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Tuna Toksoz 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks!

Tuna Toksöz
Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.

http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://twitter.com/tehlike


On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Steve Strong 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If I generate bad HQL, then it will likely give a nasty exception.  The ANTLR 
error messages aren't the best, and since I'm injecting at the second phase of 
the parser it has even less context to work from.

However, I really shouldn't be generating bad HQL - if there are queries that, 
for whatever reason can't be translated properly, they should be failing well 
before the HQL stage.

Should also be easy to take these as bug reports during the alpha / beta stages 
and sort out any bad reporting that may exist.

Cheers,

Steve

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Tuna Toksoz 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Just one point that I would like to ask: what i've seen is that Linq exceptions 
are pretty cryptic due to ANTLR stuff. Did you make any work on it? (been a 
loooong time since i checked out NH code and read it)


Tuna Toksöz
Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.

http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://twitter.com/tehlike



On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Steve Strong 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm happy with the Linq provider.  There are some queries that will cause it to 
fail, but I think they are largely edge cases for NH (and you can always revert 
to HQL, so it's never going to be a major issue).

The key is that for all the queries that do run, I'm pretty happy that they are 
doing the right thing.

Plus I've applied the provided patch for 2169 (silly bug, quite embarrasing), 
and upgraded to the latest releases of ANTLR (both code generation and runtime 
libraries).

I'm happy for it to become an official alpha :)

Cheers,

Steve

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Fabio Maulo 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
friends...
probably you are new in NH.
To release Alpha1 is not the end of the world.
Have sit, hold on, take a coffee and wait.

Between Alpha1 and GA release we will fix a lot of issues as usual.

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:22 PM, nadav s 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
i'm not sure if its the right post to say it but,
i know that this patch:
http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2170

might not be a problem to many people
but for my teams, and i'm sure many others (although did not vote for it)
would very very much appreciate if it will be applied to the trunk so we could 
use it and won't have to edit the code (again) to make it available

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Diego Mijelshon 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
LOL... true.
Anyway, it's just an example. My only concern is that many (important?) bugs 
remain open... I believe it would be important to know the plan for each (like, 
"won't fix"/"will fix before GA"/etc)

   Diego

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:07, Fabio Maulo 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Diego Mijelshon 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And what about bugs like 2169<http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2169>?

It is an open ticket as various others.

Using Naples's dialect:
Ogni scarrafone é bello a' mamma soia.

Translated in Italian:
Ogni scrafaggio é bello, per la sua mamma.

Translated in English + Information Technology:
Each bug is the most important for its reporter.

--
Fabio Maulo




--
Fabio Maulo







Reply via email to