and everyone should think that NH is not the place where ask the solution of all evils.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Roy Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The 'ToList()' workaround is silly really, you don't want to fetch > > > all data to do an aggregate in-memory > > > eh?!??!?? > > NH ha to workaround RDBMS issue. > > NH have to work around to commercial companies visual components. > > I think Frans' point is that even though the Count() seems redundant > after a Take(), it's still a completely valid LINQ query. > > Certainly, when one is directly writing the LINQ query, it's not a > problem to simply add a ToList(), but when working with third-party > components like the original poster is, it's not always reasonable to > expect them to be able to modify the query. > > Having said that, I think everyone is aware how complex writing a LINQ > provider is :) > > -- > Roy -- Fabio Maulo
