Not exactly. Looking a little deeper, it's the ODBC driver (or ODBC in general) that doesn't support named parameters.
So out only option might be to revert to using the parameters in order (and not being able to support http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-1981). Alternatively, we could maybe expand the parameter lists for drivers that don't support it? I'm not sure which is more work at this point. From: Fabio Maulo Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] NH-1981 and databases without named parameters On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Richard Brown <[email protected]> wrote: Ah, I see you said it doesn't support named parameters. Crap. Rethink required. :-( Sent from my Android phone. An issue to the Informix DataProvider is not appropriate ? -- Fabio Maulo
