"your framework" ?
I don't know what you mean.
I was talking about a Team and not a person and, btw, in my world any OSS
project is owned by the cloud.

See you to the next coming soon feature.
http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2256

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Step by step you will see how we will give the ability to extend our
> Linq-
> > Provider giving you the way to inject the translation of your own LINQ-
> > extension-methods.
> > Doing so, you can implement a string extension named Like, working in
> RAM,
> > and can be translated to SQL.
> >
> > Hopefully, in this way, all users can find his own way to translate
> > StartsWith, EndsWith, Length, Count(), Count, and so on and perhaps
> somebody
> > will share his solution in the same way they share his opinion.
>
>         If you want a solution for that, just ask. (and whether when it's a
> good idea or not). However till now, what I've read here we just have to
> wait and not say anything. Fine by me, but you and your framework aren't
> helped by that IMHO.
>
>                FB
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Wenig, Stefan <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >       > -----Original Message-----
> >       > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> nhibernate-
> >       > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
> >       >
> >
> >       >       Good point you brought up here. I can imagine escaping is
> the
> >       > reason
> >       > why the '%' is separated (I asked a question about this, but it's
> > not
> >       > answered) along the way, so you can do simple escaping without
> > running
> >       > the
> >       > risk of escaping the '%' character as well. The problem is though
> > that
> >       > the
> >       > '%' is separated in the _query_, which is odd, as I assume the
> > specific
> >       > AST
> >       > part, namely the LIKE expression part, is handled by a method
> which
> >       > only
> >       > emits like fragments, and thus knows how to append the '%' after
> it
> >       > produces
> >       > the escape line.
> >
> >
> >       Too many assumptions for me to follow up on, someone from the NH
> team
> > would have to weigh in here (if they want).
> >       For me, it would be much easier to follow this if I could see the
> > interim HQL. As things are now, I often cannot tell whether something is
> > rooted in LINQ to HQL or in HQL to SQL.
> >       I just asked Steve, he said he could do it quite easily (but didn't
> > say if he actually will ;-))
> >
> >
> >       >
> >       >       Not all databases support the same escaping btw (or at
> all),
> > so
> >       > this
> >       > might be a dialect specific feature.
> >
> >
> >       I believe LIKE '100\%%' ESCAPE '\' to be ANSI SQL. Differences
> exist
> > of course, such as the regex-like [...] in TSQL.
> >
> >       http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt
> >
> >               8.5  <like predicate>
> >
> >               Function
> >
> >               Specify a pattern-match comparison.
> >
> >               Format
> >
> >               <like predicate> ::=
> >                    <match value> [ NOT ] LIKE <pattern>
> >                      [ ESCAPE <escape character> ]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to