As per the suggestion on another thread, I reworked the patch in
NH-2263 into SVN style. I also cleaned up a couple things due to the
latest changes and info. It'd be great if it could be given a second
look.
I'm going to go digging to see what the issue was with
Common.Logging. Dealing with log4net is the final piece in the client
profile puzzle.
On a more general note, is it correct to assume that it would be
frowned upon to use a forked version of a dependent library? In my
case, this would mean a log4net without a hard dependency on
System.Web.
Patrick Earl
