Ok, accepted.

We still waiting the explication from the issue-owner gwapo1000.

The "without a big business-monster behind it" is there because I would talk
about something feasible where the definition of "done" is clear. A link to
the MSDN will result in a utopia and I will be out from that discussion.

I have invited all users to collaborate with the documentation more than one
time, we all have:
http://knol.google.com/k/fabio-maulo/nhibernate/1nr4enxv3dpeq/21#
http://nhforge.org/wikis/
Clean-up of API documentation http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-1467
And some others patches about reference (
http://nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html)
A user wrote some documentation in google-doc but I can't find the link
Obviously 4 books (http://nhforge.org/content/Books.aspx)

In practice there are many public and open way to write documentation but
very few people working in it... so even if we can talk about it a lot, I
prefer to talk about clear and feasible targets (concrete & pragmatic !=
rude).

P.S. In the future I would see the guy affected by the supposed "rude"
answer saying that I was rude, instead read the interpretation of some
"lawyers" defining me rude only because his suppositions.

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Oskar Berggren <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Fabio,
>
> I guess it was the part about "without a big business-monster behind
> it" that I failed to see the relevance of, and because of it my mind
> then jumped to conclusions about your motives. Apparently my
> interpretation was wrong. My apologies.
>
> My contribution so far is limited to trying to answer questions on nhuser.
>
> /Oskar
>
>
> 2010/9/28 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>:
> > I'm asking too.
> > I don't understand which kind of documentation gwapo1000 is looking for.
> > Oskar, which is your problem ? why my questions are not polite ?
> > I'm asking to gwapo1000, perhaps he can send us a link, an example or a
> more
> > clear explication of the documentation he is looking for.
> > I have personally wrote some docs, and I have personally re-designed some
> > diagram as I'm personally deployed the API-docs using SandCastle. There
> are
> > some users helping us with the improvement of documentation (the last one
> > was Diego Mijelshon) creating issues and providing proposals. Instead
> waste
> > your time defining what is polite and what is not polite perhaps you,
> Oskar,
> > may do something.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Oskar Berggren <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Please Fabio, he was only asking politely. It seems unreasonable to
> >> demand proof that some other OSS project have documented their
> >> internals before you are allowed to ask if such information happens to
> >> exist for this project. Surely the usefulness of such documentation
> >> doesn't depend on some random other project having that kind of
> >> documentation?
> >>
> >> Reading source code is useful, and must ultimately be done to gain
> >> full understanding, but having a high-level map of the forest of
> >> details isn't worthless. IMHO.
> >>
> >> /Oskar
> >>
> >> Ps. I'm not suggesting that someone unpaid _must_ write such docs,
> >> unless they want to.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2010/9/28 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>:
> >> > For example ?
> >> > Have you an example of the documentation you are looking for with a
> link
> >> > to
> >> > those docs of another OSS project without a big business-monster
> behind
> >> > it ?
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:05 PM, gwp <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi, i would like to learn nhibernate internals, and therefore im
> >> >> trying to find some documentation for nhibernate source code. Most
> >> >> class contatin only briefly description, i would like see for example
> >> >> some diagram, some pattern usage , more technical infrormation.Of
> >> >> course i can read source code, but without proper information its
> very
> >> >> difficult task.  If anyone know if such docs exists? or documentation
> >> >> is only in source code and mailing list?
> >> >>
> >> >> thanks in advance.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Fabio Maulo
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
> >
> >
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to