Can we give support even for System.Uri ? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or you may think that .Net3.5 mean .Net3.5 and then discover that there is > a .Net3.5 but... "Client Profile"where something was removed. > In general each dependency is a PITA internal to .NET framework or external > it is a PITA... the internals to the .NET framework are a PITA a little bit > small but a PITA. > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well... you may have a dependency to mscorelib and then discover that >> there is another mscorelib where something is missed. >> O no? >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Rory Plaire <codekai...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> System.Xml.Linq is in .Net v3.5 and .Net v4.0 Client and above. Taking a >>> dependency should pose no problem if .Net 3.5 is required. >>> >>> The difference between a dependency on a subpart of the framework and the >>> framework as a whole seems to me to be nothing. >>> >>> -r >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Pablo Ruiz <pablo.r...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If the fix is trivial.. I would avoid referencing Sys.Xml.Linq.. Maybe >>>> as an external IUserType or as part of NhuAddIns? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2342 >>>>> >>>>> <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2342>Opinions about the >>>>> introduction of a dependency to System.Xml.Linq ? >>>>> The fix is trivial but I would avoid another dependency even if it is >>>>> part of ".Net" framework (which one of the .Net frameworks only God and >>>>> Microsoft know) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Fabio Maulo >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- Fabio Maulo
