mmmmmmmmmmmm.... Perhaps we having all we need without add this feature... there are times when hidden gems are really hidden, they are in front of us and just because they are dirty we think are simple stones.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > "session-scoped listeners" is a nice title for a post. > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well... do it exactly as listeners is not the scope but.... you can add >> listeners at session-open and remove listeners at session close ;) >> btw, as the usage of listeners, even in this case the limitation is the >> imagination of the user. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The idea is that we would allow users to extend the session, within the >>> scope of the session. >>> >>> Think about it like listeners, but for a single session. Important, this >>> also let me know when the session is disposed. >>> That means that I can do cleanups. >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> <version type="session-managed"/> >>> >>> So we don't have a Version property, and the value is stored inside the >>> context of the session. >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> Cleanup INotifyPropertyChanged references on session disposable. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> should i assume you meant extension methods? >>>> >>>> What sorts of things do you have? >>>> >>>> >>>> Tuna Toksöz >>>> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. >>>> >>>> http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz >>>> http://tunatoksoz.com >>>> http://twitter.com/tehlike >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all. >>>>> I would implements extension-objects for the session. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Fabio Maulo >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- Fabio Maulo
