ok, you're right, this is possible with SVN, but it is so much easier with a DCVS. And you have the whole commit history of the patch to work with.
I sincerely think anyone who switches from SVN to mercurial or git will never want to go back, once they learn the new system. Cheers, Jorge On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean as take a patch, make some code review and commit the patch ? > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > > El 11/11/2010, a las 14:08, Jorge <[email protected]> escribió: > >> Hello, >> >> On a constructive note, to address some people's concerns over DCVS >> induced anarchy, I think using a DCVS may help *reduce* the pressure >> on some of the project's core commiters. >> >> For example, consider this workflow: >> Because it is so easy to pull between repos, a core commiter could >> choose a couple of trusted "lieutenants" who could merge pull requests >> into their repositories, and do a little quality control on the >> commits. Then, the core committer could pull from these satellite >> repos, knowing that the quality of these commits will be high. >> >> >> Both bitbucket and github could support this workflow, which is not >> possible with centralized system. >> >> Cheers, >> Jorge >> >> >> >
