No problem -- advise if you have any troubles with it; I'm pretty sure I did it right but will trust you to tell me if not :)
Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Roger Kratz <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks > > /Roger > > ________________________________ > Från: [email protected] [ > [email protected]] för Stephen Bohlen [ > [email protected]] > Skickat: den 1 augusti 2011 15:10 > Till: nhibernate-development > Ämne: Re: [nhibernate-development] DCVS > > Was simpler to just do it myself than to figure out exactly which perms > Roger might need to set it up himself (being 'admin' for the NHE project is > apparently insufficient ???) > > In any case, all done now -- advise any troubles~! > > Steve Bohlen > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > Sure, I'll take care of it now.... > > Steve Bohlen > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > Steve, > Roger Kratz, NH.Envers lead, needs permissions to configure the JIRA for > bitbucket (Envers is already on bitbucket) can you provide him the needed > permissions? > Thanks. > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > > El 01/08/2011, a las 09:26, Stephen Bohlen <<mailto:[email protected]> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: > > Excellent -- I knew about both of these being available for JIRA, but was > uncertain whether they were installed on the new hosted instance. If plugin > availability isn't a blocker, then we're free and clear to make the decision > based on the other (more important) factors. > > Steve Bohlen > <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com>< > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com>http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > <http://twitter.com/sbohlen><http://twitter.com/sbohlen> > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Fabio Maulo <<mailto:[email protected] > ><mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > AFAIK There are already two plugin installed: Git integration and Bitbucket > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > > El 01/08/2011, a las 08:39, Stephen Bohlen <<mailto:[email protected] > ><mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > escribió: > > Drawing an arbitrary line in the sand for the sake of forcing a decision on > this issue, I propose that we use 8/15 (2 weeks from today) as the planned > target date for us to go-live officially within *some* DVCS (to be > determined in the next two weeks). This will permit us to lock-down the > repo for any commits over the weekend of 8/13-8/14 to make this change. > > My present leaning on this issue is toward the following approach: > > * move to github for source code management > * retain the present hosted JIRA instance with Atlassian for issue > management > * investigate the available options for JIRA <--> Git integration under > the present hosted JIRA (e.g., will Atlassian support one of the several git > plugins for JIRA under the hosted infrastructure?) > > While there are some obvious benefits to potentially moving to github for > integrated issue management as well, IMO there is too much value (historical > and otherwise) in the existing JIRA content (both resolved issues and > pending) to simply jettison JIRA as an issue-tracker after some arbitrary > date and move the issue management responsibility to github as well (though > I would be very interested in other committers' opinion on this matter as > well -- perhaps I'm overvaluing the existing JIRA content?). > > Other thoughts --? > > PS: I do concur that the slight pause that we will have in activity > following the 3.2GA release makes this the best time to consider this move > for the project. > > Steve Bohlen > <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]><mailto: > [email protected]>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com>< > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com><http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > >http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > <http://twitter.com/sbohlen><http://twitter.com/sbohlen>< > http://twitter.com/sbohlen>http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Julian Maughan <<mailto: > [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]><mailto: > [email protected]>[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > The core committers will make a decision on this in due course: taking into > account all of the discussions that have been had on the subject (of which > there have been many!), as well as the more practical considerations around > what it will take to make such a transition. > > In my opinion, if we are going to make the move, now is a good time to do > it. > > > On 1 August 2011 15:29, Ramon Smits <<mailto:[email protected] > ><mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I thought I read somewhere that when 3.2.0 would be released that there > would be a switch to DCVS of which I thought git/github was pretty popular. > > Is this still the case? > > -- > Ramon > > > > > > >
