Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that the Hibernate devs can be trusted with a simple call for opinion.
/G 2011/8/4 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > To evaluate what ? > for example how many commits comes from users outside the core team ? > http://www.ohloh.net/p/hibernate/contributors?page=1 > > to then compare it with NH core team ? > http://www.ohloh.net/p/nhibernate/contributors?page=1 > > or, perhaps, to verify that they have currently 21 open pull-requests and 0 > closed ? (that mean that they have had 21 pull-requests since they are in > git-hub) > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-core/pulls > > Perhaps could be better if the NHibernate team uses its own criteria to > move sources > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The Hibernate (Java) project is hosted by GitHub. Maybe that's a good >> (albeit vague) reason to go there, or at least they could be the ones to ask >> for opinions. >> >> /G >> >> >> 2011/8/4 Richard Brown (gmail) <[email protected]> >> >> >>> I’m truly ambivalent about git vs. hg, and github vs. bitbucket (if SVN >>> was super-fast and entirely disconnected, I’d keep it in a heartbeat.) >>> However, I suspect that given the (very) limited committer resources we >>> have, I think our single biggest deciding factor when choosing a DVCS hub is >>> going to be choosing the one that provides the best contribution from the >>> community. (Note, by ‘best’ I mean quality over quantity ... quality >>> patches are rare.) >>> >>> Unfortunately I don’t think there’s any way you can ‘prove’ which of >>> these is the beast choice in advance of the decision ... I think we just >>> need to rely on anecdotal evidence from people who have used both as to how >>> many (high quality) contributions are received on each; github appears to >>> win on this point. >>> >>> >>> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > >
