A pull request for a fix to NH-2846 has just been committed. /G
2011/10/17 nfplee <[email protected]> > Hi, i'm still waiting on the following before i can upgrade from > version 2: > > https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2856 (patch applied) > https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2846 (unit test attached) > > Both issues seem very popular based on the number of votes and people > watching. It would be great if you could fit in some time to check out > these issues. > > Thanks > > On Oct 13, 1:09 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > btw... I have some problem to back to code in NH... there is a sort of > wall > > in front of me > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The issue with parameters and SP shouldn't be so hard to fix... having > some > > > failing tests ;) > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>https://nhibernate.jira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jql. > .. > > > > >> I agree 20 fixes doesn’t sound like a lot, although I was more > concerned > > >> with the nature of just a couple of them that prevents the current 3.2 > being > > >> used on databases other than SQL Server. I’m guessing 95% of the > user-base > > >> is SQL Server though, so perhaps that not as big a problem as some > others. > > > > >> If there’s still a couple of parameter problems (and the Fabio’s link > > >> suggests there could be), it would be nice to get them fixed before > another > > >> release. > > > > >> I’m happy to set a vague target date of a month from now for the next > > >> release. > > > > >> *From:* Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > > >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:29 PM > > >> *To:* [email protected] > > >> *Subject:* Re: [nhibernate-development] NH3.2.1 > > >> In nhusers group you can find some other "potential"very important > > >> issues to fix. > > >> Like this one > > >>https://groups.google.com/d/topic/nhusers/dmvshMfQTI0/discussion > > > > >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Julian Maughan < > [email protected] > > >> > wrote: > > > > >>> 20 resolved JIRA issues doesn't seem much for a build. And there are > > >>> quite few potential improvements and fixes in the form of pull > requests that > > >>> could be included. Perhaps give it another month? > > > > >>> Having said that, I'm not strongly against a release if you guys are > keen > > >>> to do it now, and I'm happy to help with the work. > > >>> On 12 October 2011 23:18, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> I think it would be good to release. > > > > >>>> Patrick Earl > > > > >>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > Probably. What is the consensus? Are we ready to release 3.2.1 > as of > > >>>> now > > >>>> > or not --? > > > > >>>> > Steve Bohlen > > >>>> > [email protected] > > >>>> >http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > > >>>> >http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > > >>>> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) > > >>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> >> I see that Julian has fixed a (high priority IMHO) problem that > > >>>> affects > > >>>> >> several different platforms: > > >>>>https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2893 > > > > >>>> >> Should we revisit releasing 3.2.1? > > > > >>>> >> From: sbohlen > > >>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:55 AM > > >>>> >> To: [email protected] > > >>>> >> Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] NH3.2.1 > > >>>> >> Just wondering if anyone can provide a clarification on the > status of > > >>>> what > > >>>> >> we're planning to do with this (?) It seemed that initially > there > > >>>> was some > > >>>> >> urgency around trying to rapidly release a 3.2.1GA to get this > > >>>> modification > > >>>> >> officially out there for people but then this thread has sat idle > for > > >>>> 8+ > > >>>> >> days now. The issue shows RESOLVED so we should be clear to > release > > >>>> a > > >>>> >> 3.2.1GA at this point AFAIK. Are there other blockers preventing > > >>>> this at > > >>>> >> this point that need attention or is it possible to proceed with > the > > >>>> release > > >>>> >> now? > > > > >>>> >> (concerned for the performance implications of having this issue > > >>>> present > > >>>> >> in our latest 'official' release out there for adopters) > > > > >>>> >> Thoughts --? > > > > >>>> >> -Steve B. > > > > >> -- > > >> Fabio Maulo > > > > > -- > > > Fabio Maulo > > > > -- > > Fabio Maulo- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - >
