Can we check to see if they really mean "integration with various SCC systems" (like bitbucket, git, etc.) or do they mean "integration with other Atlassian products" (like Bamboo, Fisheye, Greenhopper, etc. that are part of the rest of their OnDemand product suite)? Its not clear to me what they mean in their reply.
My initial reading was sim. to yours (e.g., it was referring to github. bitbucket, etc. integration) but their references to our not using other "OnDemand" subsystems makes me think that they might actually not be referring to SCC integration per se. Can we check/clarify w/ them exactly what they are proposing to "shut off" --? Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Roger Kratz <[email protected]>wrote: > << ... which is the github integration as far as I can tell>> > << They now propose to migrate to a Jira-only model, since we don't > actually use any of the integrations available in Jira Studio. Is it true > that we don't use any of the integrations?>> > > No, it's not true - it is used in NHibernate.Envers project. At least if I > understand "integration" in this context correctly? Envers (on BitBucket) > changesets and its source code are "integrated" with Jira issues based on > the commit message. > > It's a nice feature but if it kills performance it's a no-brainer... Can > live without it. > > /Roger > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Oskar Berggren > Sent: den 10 februari 2012 11:21 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [nhibernate-development] Jira performance continued - remove > integrations? > > Hi, > > To followup on the previous thread about Jira performance. As I've > mentioned before I have an open support request with Atlassian, which have > now been escalated to a developer. > > They had a suspicion that we were suffering from a variation of > https://studio.atlassian.com/browse/GHC-105 (GHC causes extreme > performance degradation) which is the github integration as far as I can > tell. > > They now propose to migrate to a Jira-only model, since we don't actually > use any of the integrations available in Jira Studio. Is it true that we > don't use any of the integrations? How do you feel about this proposal? > Full text from Atlassian below: > > A comment from their developer: > > "Very sad to hear that your instance is experience poor performance, > indeed our > new platform is expected to deliver an massive improvement on response > times > and stability for large instances as this one, unfortunately looks > like we may have > been hitting a bug/contention on the software side, as the machine > load is very > low. I'm digging further to try to understand where the contention is > happening. > > I agree with you that 10+ seconds to view a page is unacceptable and I > can > guarantee that this is not the average response time we try to deliver > on the > OnDemand platform." > > > And the proposal: > > "I noticed that you guys have a full OnDemand license but have disabled > all the > other applications tabs, leaving just JIRA, looking on the other apps > doesn't seem > to anyone using them, in that case I would suggest that we migrate > your license > to be JIRA only, that will remove a lot of OnDemand integrations with > the other > apps that no-one is using, that will most certainly increase the > performance. > > Please let me know if JIRA is the only application you need on this > instance so > we can make the switch, and after we do that we can monitor to see if > it still > shows slow response times." > > > > /Oskar >
