Hi,

thanks for looking at it!
It can't be reproduced with SQLite directly, only with a wrapper
provider I wrote for the second unit test attached to
https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2527
I didn't include that second unit test in the pull request because you
run the tests against Oracle on your build server and Oracle will fail
for sure.

On Feb 20, 8:24 am, Julian Maughan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi cremor, I actually took a look at your pull request last night - reason
> being that it affects several issues, has a priority of Critical, and you
> have provided tests and a pull request. I will continue looking at it for
> 3.3.
>
> Running the tests you provided against SQL Server doesn't fail, but I think
> you mentioned the issue can be reproduced with SQLite, so I will try that
> next.
>
> On 20 February 2012 15:17, cremor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > One question is if there remains any open issues that *MUST* be fixed in
> > 3.3.0?
>
> > You might see that differently because I'm actually affected by the
> > bug, but in my opinion my open pull request is an essential fix:
> >https://github.com/nhibernate/nhibernate-core/pull/55
>
> > If one is affected by this bug, an exception is thrown, so it is
> > critical in my opinion. And the fix is quite simple.
> > And it fixes 3 JIRA issues ;-)
>
> > On Feb 17, 10:52 am, Oskar Berggren <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 2012/2/17 nfplee <[email protected]>:
>
> > > > Hi, i was wondering when 3.3.0 is due? I ask because it's been a long
> > > > time since version 3.2 was released and version 3.3 addresses alot of
> > > > the issues (mainly with the LINQ provider) that prevented me from
> > > > upgrading a site which uses version 2.x. Sorry to seem pushy but i've
> > > > been delaying this project for quite a while now and my client is
> > > > being to get inpatient.
>
> > > No exact date has been set, but the consensus when last discussed was
> > > that it should be soon.
>
> > > One question is if there remains any open issues that *MUST* be fixed in
> > 3.3.0?
>
> > > Another thing, if you haven't done so already it would be great if you
> > > could do the upgrade to the current preliminary 3.3.0 trunk, to see if
> > > the current state will work for your project or if there are
> > > regressions or issues that will still be a problem.
>
> > > /Oskar

Reply via email to