You could still use the old bytecode provider, but you have to compile it
yourself.

Diego

P.S.: you answered to me directly and not to the group, I've added it back.


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:19 AM, David Zwingelberg <
[email protected]> wrote:

> In my opinion it is a show stopper. If you are using lazy properties in
> your environment you can not switch to a newer NHibernate version than 3.1.
> Or is there any workaround I haven't considered?
>
> Am Montag, 11. März 2013 22:37:34 UTC+1 schrieb Diego Mijelshon:
>
>> Yeah, you are right. It's probably worth merging, but I don't know how
>> big is the effort.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Alexander I. Zaytsev 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Diego, it is fixed in master branch, which is going to be vNext not 3.3.3
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/3/12 Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> It says in the last comment that it was fixed, but there hasn't been a
>>>> new build out since then.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:13 AM, David Zwingelberg <
>>>> david.zw...@googlemail.**com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>> Are there any plans to support lazy properties in NHibernate 3 as it
>>>>> documented in the issue NH-3058 (https://nhibernate.jira.com/**
>>>>> browse/NH-3058 <https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-3058>)?
>>>>> I am faced with the bug in the version 3.2.0 to 3.3.3. So I am still
>>>>> using NHibernate in version 3.1.0 with the NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.
>>>>> **ProxyFactoryFactory which doesn't cause the problem. But I want to
>>>>> profit from the linq features implemented in the next versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is this problem not fixed in the NH3? Will the fix be merged in
>>>>> 3.next?
>>>>>
>>>>> The attachement contains a solution which causes the problem as it is
>>>>> used in my environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "nhibernate-development" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to nhibernate-development+**[email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "nhibernate-development" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to nhibernate-development+**[email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "nhibernate-development" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to nhibernate-development+**[email protected].
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhibernate-development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to