You have to commit the transaction. NH requires transactions for reads as well.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Craig Neuwirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey James, > > You are absolutely correct. Once I added the transaction, my unit test > passed. However, the actual scenario I am trying to get working is assuming > data is in the db already and I perform an initial query. I want that > result to go into the second level cache so it is retrieved from the cache > when the same query is executed. How do I make that happen? I tried > putting transaction around the query, but that didn't work and I don't think > that should be necessary for reads. > > thanks, > craig > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:14 PM, James Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> I am looking at it right now. Initial investigations... The problem seems >> to stem from lack of transaction handling in the test case. If rather than >> flushing the session, you commit a transaction, the SysCache returns data >> appropriately. I'll post more as I find out more. (Just posting to save >> Ayende some time.) >> >> James >> -- >> James Kovacs, B.Sc., M.Sc., MCSD, MCT >> Microsoft MVP - C# Architecture >> http://www.jameskovacs.com >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 403-397-3177 (mobile) >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Guys, >>> I am going to look at the issue now, will post my results soon >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Gildas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Fabio, I know that I'm still noob in NHibernate and that I may ask >>>> stupid questions. I'm sorry if you are bored with this, but well, >>>> please understand that I'm just trying to resolve a problem I did not >>>> have before upgrading to last NHibernate trunk. >>>> >>>> Going through Rhino code, I can see that my session is created at each >>>> request, so that's not the problem. >>>> Anyway, I still don't have any second level cache. Items are updated >>>> but never retrieved from it. >>>> >>>> Can someone check the test case from craig, which is failing and don't >>>> use any fancy session management ? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> On Sep 7, 8:35 pm, "Fabio Maulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > 2008/9/7 Gildas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > So I'm going to ask if this is the right way to handle sessions ? >>>> From >>>> > > what I remember of NHibernate, NH Sessions must not be stored in >>>> > > HttpContext.Session. I may not understand the reasons why this done >>>> > > like this in UnitOfWorkApplication, maybe for long transactions >>>> > > management ? >>>> > >>>> > Rhino UoW use httpSession only for long conversation... >>>> > The NhSession CAN be stored in the httpSession simply because is the >>>> "most >>>> > simple" way to manage long-conversations. >>>> > -- >>>> > Fabio Maulo >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
