So you only want some of your entities to be marked as deleted and you want
other entities to actually delete?




On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Patrick De Boeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> I have seen that example, but if I take that case as an example then
> my order would be softdeletable, but the orderline would not!
>
> Thus when I remove my order that will be set to "IsDeleted = true",
> while my orderlines would actually be deleted immediately!
>
> This leads to resaving a deleted orderline !
>
>
> On 10 sep, 18:37, "Will Shaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://blogs.hibernatingrhinos.com/nhibernate/archive/2008/04/08/soft...
> >
> > There is also some code in the NHibernate Contrib project under
> > NHibernate.Burrow.Appblock.SoftDelete that you can review or use.
> >
> >  -Will
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Patrick De Boeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>  >
> >
> >
> > > Hi All,
> >
> > > I have the following situation:  A domain model which has various
> > > classes that all map to one or more tables in a DB2 database.  For
> > > keeping track of versioning our dba guys have written a trigger that
> > > will copy the entire table record into a seperate 'history' version
> > > table.
> >
> > > No worries untill they figured out that with this approach it would be
> > > impossible to track who actually deleted an item.  So they went a step
> > > further and made deletes forbidden.  Now we would have to update the
> > > record and set the a field to '+DELETE+'.  A trigger will then run
> > > afterwards and copy the 'deleted' version to the history and then
> > > fysically delete the row.
> >
> > > So far the intro.  I have made an interface IVersionable (because not
> > > all domain objects require this approach) and have written a
> > > IVersionableDeleteEventListener that will do the following:
> >
> > > if (entity is IVersionable)
> > > {
> > >       IVersionable versionable = (IVersionable)entity;
> > >       versionable.CreatedBy = "+DELETE+";
> > >       versionable.LastModification = DateTime.Now;
> > >       versionable.LastModifiedBy =
> > > UserContextHelper.GetUserPrincipal();
> >
> > >       CascadeBeforeDelete(session, persister, entity, entityEntry,
> > > transientEntities);
> > >       CascadeAfterDelete(session, persister, entity,
> > > transientEntities);
> > > }
> > > else
> > > {
> > >       base.DeleteEntity(session, entity, entityEntry,
> > > isCascadeDeleteEnabled,
> > >                                  persister, transientEntities);
> > > }
> >
> > > This now conflicts with my cascading rules I have set for this
> > > object.  I receive the following error: "deleted object would be re-
> > > saved by cascade"
> >
> > > The problem lies in the fact that A has a collection of B.  A is
> > > Versionable while B is not.  Thus B should be deleted and A should be
> > > marked for deletion.  The cascading options set on A try the re-save B
> > > which results in the above error.
> >
> > > Does anyone have had the same problem and how have you then solved
> > > this?
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to