Hmm, right.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> what if I have an assembly which has a core domain objects and users
> create custom extensions with subclasses in a separate assembly?
>
> I'll re-iterate. I'm happy to provide a patch if someone points me to
> the right file.
>
> peter
>
>
> On Sep 26, 4:37 pm, "Tuna Toksöz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So my question is can we add new mappings for classes after the session
> > factory is initialized?If yes, you are very correct, if not, you can
> always
> > change mapping.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > for those who haven't read the latest edition of hibernate book by
> > > gavin. from chapter 13 page 584, he provides an example of a query
> > > generated by hibernate for classes that use discriminator
> >
> > > select
> > > b1.BILLING_DETAILS_ID,
> > > b1.OWNER,
> > > b1.USER_ID,
> > > b2.ACCOUNT,
> > > b2.BANKNAME,
> > > b2.SWIFT,
> > > b1.BILLING_DETAILS_TYPE as clazz
> > > from
> > > BILLING_DETAILS b1
> >
> > > In gavin's example, BILLINGS_DETAILS_TYPE is the discriminator
> > > column.  In order for polymorphic queries to work properly in
> > > Hibernate and NHibernate, it looks at billings details type and then
> > > determines which class to instantiate. Even though my use case doesn't
> > > have a subclass at the present, there will be subclasses eventually.
> > > Logically, the select statement for all discriminated classes need to
> > > include the discriminator column. Other clearly disagree, or have a
> > > different understanding of how polymorphic queries should work. Having
> > > worked on and used other ORM tools, the approach used by other tools
> > > is to always include the discriminator column.
> >
> > > peter
> >
> > > On Sep 26, 3:38 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Using a where="" is the appropriate action here, not a discriminator.
> >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > sorry for the confusing explanations. I'll attempt to explain it
> > > > > better.
> >
> > > > > Here is the situation.
> >
> > > > > I. I have a table in a legacy database which has existing records
> > > > > which use the concept of a discriminator. In other words, there is
> a
> > > > > type_code column, which has different values.
> >
> > > > > II. I have a C# object which represents an entity. The entity maps
> to
> > > > > records in the table with a specific discriminator value.
> >
> > > > > III. I only want to get the records with a specific discriminator
> > > > > value from the table like "home_address".
> >
> > > > > IV. I have a modeling tool which generates C# classes with the
> > > > > appropriate NH attributes. Changing the code gen for the special
> case
> > > > > to use one of the work arounds feels like a hack to me.
> >
> > > > > V. since polymorphic queries require the discriminator column to
> > > > > create the correct object instance, shouldn't it always include it
> in
> > > > > the select part of the sql statement?
> >
> > > > > thanks for taking time to listen and respond.
> >
> > > > > peter
> >
> > > > > On Sep 26, 3:20 pm, "Jon Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > If you have only one class mapped then the only thing it can
> return
> > > is
> > > > > > that one class so why would it need the address_type_code column?
> >
> > > > > > One of your previous emails indicated the problem was returning
> all
> > > rows
> > > > > > from the table. I'm confused about what the problem is your
> tryign to
> > > > > > solve.
> >
> > > > > > Jon
> >
> > --
> > Tuna Toksöz
> >
> > Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
> >
>


-- 
Tuna Toksöz

Typos included to enhance the readers attention!

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to