Thanks a lot. I could get rid of some of the unhandy FK names. Is there a way to do the same for <many-to-one>?
Kindest regards, Victor On 03.10.2008 01:09, James Kovacs wrote: > You can define explicit names for your foreign key relationships via > the foreign-key attribute. For example: > > <class name="Customer" table="Customer" > > <id name="Id" column="ID"> > <generator class="guid" /> > </id> > <property name="Name" not-null="true" /> > <set name="Addresses" cascade="all"> > <key column="CustomerID" foreign-key="FK_Customer_Address" /> > <one-to-many class="Address"/> > </set> > </class> > > James > -- > James Kovacs, B.Sc., M.Sc., MCSD, MCT > Microsoft MVP - C# Architecture > http://www.jameskovacs.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 403-397-3177 (mobile) > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Victor Toni <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > is it possible to influence the naming of foreign keys / constraints? > These would "look better" if one could provide a more meaningful name > than FKxxxxxxxxxxxx ... > > Kindest regards, > Victor > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
