Hi

When using union-subclass, the foreign-key naming in the base type does not 
work. No crash, but the foreign key won't be named as stated. Is this by 
design/known issue or should I JIRA this?

<class name="Base">
...
<many-to-one name="Foo" foreign-key="ThisNamingDoesNotMatter" />

<union-subclass name="Concrete" extends="Base">
...

/Roger

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to