Am I the only one totally clueless about why RedHat is considered that evil?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Sidar Ok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was expecting this :) > > There was this similar discussion in altdotnet mailing list, and I remember > Ayende told that Redhat is the commercial support vendor and keeps liability > (please correct me if I am wrong). > > Does this mean that there is no commercial company behind nh ? If there is > not, it is another issue, if there is JBoss it is another. (both are not > good for those companies who are committed to use nothing coming from > anywhere other than redmond) > > There are at least a couple of big companies I know that they are using nh, > but not are likely to shout it just because of redhat. > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/10/12 Sidar Ok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> Most issues are revolving around nh being open source and backed by >>> redhat, to my experience. >>> >> >> I'm sorry... >> NH was backed by JBOSS for one year. >> The day that RedHat buy JBOSS they do something in our back... but not >> was exactly something good... >> >> NH is backed by the NH developers and NH-community >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> >> > > > -- > Sidar Ok > http://www.sidarok.com > > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
