"optimistic-lock=dirty" On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Sidar Ok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using SQL ? Timestamps can be a consideration. > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Miika Makinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all,I have a requirement to do optimistic concurrency on field level. >> How would you approach this? Will that mean just very granular entities and >> tables or? >> >> Cheers, >> Miika >> >> >> > > > -- > Sidar Ok > http://www.sidarok.com > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
