and?Confirmation : I don't have persisted invalid entity instances even when I change a validation constraint.
2008/10/25 Luis Abreu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Oh no? And then how do you solve those cases? Lets suppose you've got a > property called Something on object X and you say it must have no less than > 3 digits. You've already persisted 1000 objects when you receive a report > saying that now Something must have no more than 10 chars and that all > digits must be bigger than 5. Aren't those 1000 objects in an invalid state? > I'd say yes, they are and yes this is a common situation that affects > many real apps… > > > > -- > > Luis Abreu > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Fabio Maulo > *Sent:* sábado, 25 de Outubro de 2008 18:56 > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [nhusers] Re: Calling constructor that performs guard checks - > immutable types > > > > I don't have persisted invalid entity instances even when I change a > validation constraint. > > 2008/10/25 Luis Abreu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yes, you can end up having persisted objects with invalid state. How? > Simple, just think about what happens when one of your validation rules > changes after your app is on production…this is an interesting topic which > has also been discussed on the altnet list… > > > > -- > > Luis Abreu > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Will Shaver > *Sent:* sábado, 25 de Outubro de 2008 17:08 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [nhusers] Re: Calling constructor that performs guard checks - > immutable types > > > > I believe this has been discussed in the past, please search the group > archives. While I believe there are solutions involving custom object > loaders, why would you have an invalid object in your database? > > On Oct 25, 2008 4:17 AM, "Fabio Maulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Repeated request. > > Our friend bstack is something impatient. > > 2008/10/22 bstack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > All, > > We are using immutable types in our domain, that we want to > map > directly to to dat... > > > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1732 - Release Date: 22-10-2008 > 07:23 > > > > > > > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1732 - Release Date: 22-10-2008 > 07:23 > > > > > -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
