Its not too much of an issue, so either we'll use HQL on NH2.0 or criteria on NH2.1. i just need to confirm that the underlying sql which is being generated is the best way to go about it.
If i can get confirmation on that, then there will be a potential requirement to move over to the trunk, which we as a company have no problems doing. But thanks once again for your help. On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know, is there any specific reason why you don't need to use 2.1? > Because it is trunk? > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Shane Posthumus < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Cool, thanks Tuna for the quick response, do you perhaps have any thoughts >> on comparing the two correlated sub queries in the where clause. >> I'm concerned that it might be a bad idea to begin with. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Probably no. AFAIR, this thing was new in trunk only. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Basically, just looking to know if comparing results from two sub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tuna Toksöz >>> >>> Typos included to enhance the readers attention! >>> >>> >>> > > > -- > Tuna Toksöz > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
