But are two different things and, if I well remember, child statefull session are not completely supported (at least not full tested).A session may be a "factory" of child sessions but would be strange to see a session as a factory of a "no-child-stateless-session"... may be only a semantic matter.
2008/11/27 Stefan Steinegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think you misunderstood. It's not "transform", it creates another > stateless session that shares the same transaction. There is actually > already a ISession.GetSession() method, it creates another session > sharing the transaction AND cache. > > Probably it should be called ISession.GetStatlessSession() > > If you would use the session factory, you would have to write > sessionfactory.OpenStatelessSession(oldsession.Connection) > what's really bad and shouldn't be recommended. > > On 27 Nov., 12:25, "Fabio Maulo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/11/27 Stefan Steinegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > What about a practical syntax like ISession.Stateless.CreateCriteria > > > (...)? > > > > mmmm... I don't like it.The SessionFactory is the factory of session and > a > > stateFull session can't be transformed in a stateless > > ISession.Stateless is ambiguous > > -- > > Fabio Maulo > > > -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
