Yes you are correct. I was playing with a few things and forgot to mention that I had removed inverse="true" as part of trying to get the requested functionality. If you have inverse="true" then the operation will cascade via the collection but no SQL will be generated as a result of modifications to the collection. Or at least, that's my understanding of the meaning of inverse="true" :-)
On Dec 1, 9:30 am, Graham Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >the first action is to null out the foreign key column. This immediately > >rules out the possibility of getting the SQL > > you are wanting. > > As far as I know, not if you have inverse=true on the collection > mapping --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
