Why do you not need them? Do you understand all of the arguments against your current methodology? What you are doing is an anti-pattern in most contexts.
Greg On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Richard (Google) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I DO start with the domain objects (or really their tests). In an ideal > scenario, the database comes next from SchemaExport()). > > Anything else I might need would be generated from the domain objects, but > if I don't need DTOs I don't see any need to complicate things further. > > Cheers, > Richard > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Greg Young" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 5:03 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [nhusers] Re: Should I use NHibernate+WCF? > >> >> see qualification "If you are heads down coding CRUD stuff" >> >> Why not define it in metadata and generate everything? >> Why not generate from the database? >> Why not go another way and create your domain class then generate >> everything else? >> >> simple CRUD ... the models are all the same it doesn't matter which >> one you start with. >> >> Greg >> > > > > > > -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
