Hi, ofcourse I do not name the properties like that. I use well defined naming conventions with self speaking names.
1. Well, i just thought a missing index (which is the case for bags) would influence searching for items 2, I read some of it and found sentences like: "Bags are the worst case. Since a bag permits duplicate element values and has no index column, no primary key may be defined." - thats why I asked later they mentined in an other context: "Just before you ditch bags forever, there is a particular case in which bags (and also lists) are much more performant than sets. For a collection with inverse="true" (the standard bidirectional one-to-many relationship idiom, for example) we can add elements to a bag or list without needing to initialize (fetch) the bag elements!" 4. ok I will reduce it! 5. the thing is I really love to use the stuff preseneted here: blogs.msdn.com/devdev/archive/2006/06/30/652802.aspx They are ideal for working with large lists and very performant. At the moment I have to convert them all the time. That's why I was asking Thanks for feedback antoschka On 12 Feb., 18:53, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/2/12 antoschka <[email protected]> > > > > > The Performance is a desaster! > > Your property-naming and composite-poid too. > 1. That is not the problem. The real problem, probably, is the amount of > data you uploading. > 2. The reference is a good place where > starthttp://nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#performance > 3. see solution of point 2 > 4. Yes! you should reduce it to one _no_ business meaning value. > 5. No. Collections are proxy; BTW "Program to an interface and not to an > implementation" (by GOF) > > -- > Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
