you can make a check for the extension and don't open anything. BTW, session has almost no impact on perfrmance as Kenneth says. Tuna Toksöz http://tunatoksoz.com http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://twitter.com/tehlike
Typos included to enhance the readers attention! On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:03 PM, TigerShark <[email protected]>wrote: > > I was actually wondering/worried about the same thing. Apparently it's > the recomended aproach (I assume you're using the session-per-request > pattern), but AFAIK there's nothing wrong with this approach. > > From what I've read, nothing is actually put to works before an actual > command is created for the session, so even though it seems like a lot > of sessions are created, nothing is being done. > > However, I believe there must be _some_ performance impact by this > approach, though it might be unnoticable. > > On 12 Mar., 17:40, Nick Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for your prompt response, Ayende! Keep it real. > > > > On Mar 12, 12:13 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 1, not really2, no > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Nick Nguyen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Upon running NHProfiler, we are noticing many sessions created for > > > > *.axd type http requests. > > > > > > 1. Is this a concern? > > > > 2. Does it impact performance? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
